Seems as though I'm a bit tardy in posting about this, but I just can't help it. In just one article, the ACLU confirmed my thoughts - that Judge John Roberts is an OUTSTANDING nomination for the Supreme Court. Read on...
WASHINGTON -- The American Civil Liberties Union today expressed deep concern about some of the civil liberties positions advocated by Judge John Roberts, President Bush's choice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court. While serving as principal deputy solicitor general from 1989-1993, he authored briefs calling for Roe v. Wade to be overruled, supporting graduation prayer, and seeking to criminalize flag burning as a form of political protest.
"All these positions were rejected by the Supreme Court," said Steven Shapiro, the ACLU's National Legal Director. "But the Supreme Court remains closely divided on many of these questions."
So, if I'm reading this right, what the ACLU means is that the Supreme Court can have opinions and outcomes, only if those opinions and outcomes are sanctioned by the ACLU.
As a senior Justice Department official, Roberts was in a position to help shape the government's legal positions as well as represent them.
At a minimum, the Senate should determine the extent to which the positions taken in these briefs also reflect Roberts's personal views.
C'mon. Roberts could support abortion, legalize child porn and create a National Hug Your Tree holiday and these liberals would STILL find something wrong with him. This statement could be made about ANYONE on the Supreme Court past or present. That's the beauty of justices being selected over the course of time and by different leadership in Washington - it brings a varied background, which helps to balance the court.
Judge John Roberts was appointed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2003. He received his undergraduate and law degrees from Harvard University and clerked for Justice Rehnquist. He served in a number of positions in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, including as principal deputy solicitor general from 1989 to 1993.
"The Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in advancing freedom," said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU Executive Director. "Without the Supreme Court, the South would still be segregated, illegal abortions would be claiming thousands of lives, the indigent would have no right to a lawyer, and lesbian and gay Americans could be imprisoned for their private sexual conduct."
"The stakes could not be higher," Romero added.
How right you are, Mr. Romero.
The ACLU will only oppose a Supreme Court nominee on a majority vote of its 83 person national board.
Why should we care what the ACLU's national board thinks? First of all, it's 83 people - big whoop! And NONE of those 83 people represent my thinking or my opinion (Ahem. Can you say NAMbLA support or legalization of child porn?). And there is nothing they can do about it should the nomination move ahead. I thought the ACLU was supposed to support those people whose "rights" are being violated? What rights has Roberts violated here?
***
Be sure to visit Stop the ACLU! and all of the participants in their weekly Blogburst!
Show Comments »
Excellent job as always! Thanks Merri!
Posted by: Jay at July 21, 2005 10:45 AM
My blog is worth $198,153.54.
How much is your blog worth?